We’re still with Brian
Klems …. Rita
Follow me on Twitter: @BrianKlems
Check out my humor book, Oh Boy, You’re Having a Girl.
Sign up for my free weekly eNewsletter: WD Newsletter
Check out my humor book, Oh Boy, You’re Having a Girl.
Sign up for my free weekly eNewsletter: WD Newsletter
Can You Copyright a Title?
Q: I’ve been working on a book and the title is very important—I
use it as the URL for my blog, for a weekly column I write, etc., and I want
people to identify it with me. Can I copyright a title so others can’t use it?
–Anonymous
A:
Copyrights cover works fixed in a tangible format, but because titles are
typically short, they don’t fall under copyright protection. So no, you can’t
copyright a title to a book, song or movie. But you can trademark a title,
which may give you the protection you seek.
The
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office states that a trademark protects words,
phrases, symbols or designs identifying the source of the goods or services of
one party and distinguishing them from those of others. Brand names like Pepsi,
Xerox and Band-Aid are all protected. So is the Nike “swoosh.” But more
relevant to us, book titles such as The Da Vinci Code and Harry
Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone are trademarked.
Unlike
copyright protection, which is granted the minute your work is written down,
trademarks aren’t handed out so freely. In fact, if the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office doesn’t consider your title (or brand) a distinctive mark that
is indisputably distinguishable from others, you will not be granted trademark
protection. This is why you see so many books with the same—or very
similar—titles. Many of the terms are considered too generic or arbitrary to
warrant protection.
Trademarks
are not only intended to protect the creator, but also the consumer. Trademarks
keep others from confusing a well-known work on the bookstore shelves with
others. For example, Harry Potter is such a popular, distinguishable character
by J.K. Rowling that you’d expect any title with his name in it to be written
by her (or, at least, a book approved by her). It’s not only her work, but it’s
become her brand.
So
if you use the title of your book as the title of your blog, column, etc., it
could be considered your brand identifier. And if you find success, you could
qualify for trademark protection.
Brian A. Klems is the online community editor of Writer’s Digest magazine
How Do You Regain Copyrights to Pieces You've Sold?
Q: About 20 years ago, I sold a short story to a magazine. One
line in my contract stated the payment was for “full rights” and another said,
“On acceptance of this payment, the author transfers the copyright interest to
… .” Does this mean I can’t sell the story ever again, even as a reprint? What
if the magazine is no longer published?—P.A.‑Humphrey
A:
Selling full rights to your work is like selling your car—once the contract is
signed, you have no rights to the piece and can’t sell it again. Works created
20 years ago are protected for the life of the author plus 70 years, so the new
owner has that copyright protection.
According
to our legal expert Amy Cook, even if a magazine is defunct, someone,
somewhere, still owns the copyright to your piece. If you want to sell that
article again, you’ll need to get the rights back.
“Even
if the company went out of business, copyrights are assets that can be bought
and sold; they don’t just disappear,” Cook says. “However, if you can find out
who currently controls the copyright, that person may be perfectly willing to
transfer the rights back to you.”
Cook
also notes that there’s a
little-known loophole
in the Copyright Act that says authors may terminate their copyright grants
after 35 years (though it doesn’t apply to works-for-hire or copyrights
transferred in wills). But this loophole still requires you to contact the
existing copyright holder and inform her that you’re exercising the clause.
It’s important to put it in writing. And if you’re doing this, I suggest
consulting a lawyer first.
Your
other option is to change the story to make it a new work. There’s no real
formula when it comes to creating a new piece out of old material. It’s
important to know that you can use the same idea, but the work can’t be
“substantially similar” to the original piece. How similar is “substantially
similar”? That’s up to the judge—if it ever comes to that.
Brian A. Klems is the online community editor of Writer’s Digest magazine
No comments:
Post a Comment